A line in the Sand

Winfred Beach, Portland Jamaica.

Winifred Beach is not the easiest spot to find but it is well worth the effort. It requires keeping a sharp eye out when travelling east out of Port Antonia to take the correct left turn that will take you into a housing area. After that with a little more faith that you are going in the right direction  you will take a very  rough (understatement) road going downhill,  for  a while the vegetation blocks any view of the sought after shore line, leaving you to ask the  first person you see, if this is indeed the beach.

 

It really is and concerns about the journey or the front end of your vehicle melt away when you finally arrive at this serene spot. The Rough Guide to Jamaica notes it was one of the settings for the film Club Paradise and describes it as one of the most “appealing beaches in all of Jamaica.”

However, it looks like a line may be drawn in the sand both physically and metaphorically. There is a fight on in regards to the future of the beach. Over simply put, on one side those who want to keep the beach free and on the other the Urban Development Corporation which wants to develop it.

 In a letter to the Jamaica Observer newspaper, The Free Winifred Beach group says it’s not against development but stresses it wants  the property to remain a “public beach and prevent non sustainable development that will prevent Jamaicans and visitors from using the beach.”

Read more at: http://www.free-winnifred.com/

The letter was written in a response to an article in the Sunday Observer of October 2 2011, and in it the group says,

 “Our only motive is to ensure that Winifred Beach is a place where rich and poor alike can enjoy one of Jamaica”

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/letters/Rich-and-poor-will-enjoy-Winnifred-Beach_9863866

The UDC was set up in 1968 and according to its website, since then it has,

“…..significantly improved the coverage and quality of public infrastructure, in addition to introducing alternative patterns of urban settlement, including creative shelter solutions and the development of new townships.”

 

  The UDC Website says that Winifred beach is part of the Fairy Hill property in Portland that the UDC got in 1976.

 Read more: http://www.udcja.com/projects_frame.htm

  The UDC says a plan to include public beach, agriculture land, site and services and community space has been created and the organization is looking at phased development for the beach.

According to Jamaica Information Service in 2004 the UDC announced plans to upgrade the Winifred public beach in Fairy Hill Portland.

  The Free Winifred Beach group points to the Beaches act it says states that if the beach is not owned uninterrupted for twenty years it cannot be privatized the organization is asking for help to raise the money to make the case and keep the beach free.

The issue may end up on the back burner for a while,  overshadowed by the  concerns  raised by the Office of the Contractor General,  over UDC operations, and an investigation into the agency that’s been ordered by the board.

This may, at least for now hand the Free Winifred Beach group an advantage

and a chance for people to experience the beach as it is for a little while longer.

 

 

 

A Tale of Two Executions.


It may be   a particularly morbid irony that this last September two executions of note took place on the same day. One perhaps, for what it was worth with more press than the other, that of Troy Davies a death row prisoner in the U.S. state of Georgia, convicted of the murder of an off duty Police Officer Mark McPhail in 1989.

Davies said he was innocent… and whilst there is a saying that prisons are full of innocent people we could perhaps concede that some of them may indeed be innocent.

Supporters of Davies drew attention to the fact that 7 out of 9 witnesses changed their original opinions and other issues to suggest that his guilty verdict was unsafe. However prosecutors stood by their case and despite the legal wrangling over the years the execution was carried out.

Davies maintained his innocence to the end, perhaps holding to the hope that a history he would not be part of in person, would absolve him, and someday he might be remembered as an innocent man wronged by the system.

Representatives of the family of Mark McPhail spoke of their belief that the execution meant that justice had been done and they should not be faulted for that, they must take what comfort they can, but there can hardly be much, when one loses a loved one to a violent and unexpected death. Could we claim to think so differently had we been in their place over the decades?

But I began by saying, a tale of two executions; the other one on the same day in Texas was of one of the men found guilty of the dragging murder of James Byrd Jr., on June 7 1998. His name was Lawrence Brewer a man convicted of a shockingly modern racially based crime. James Byrd was black and that was why he was chained to the back of a truck and dragged along behind it conscious during the ordeal until death came when his head struck a culvert.

One of the things remarked on in the reporting of the execution of Brewer was that he had requested a last meal and refused to eat it. As reported in the press that has led to an end to the practice of offering the condemned man a last meal in Texas. It all seems a little out of place in a story about killings and executions but it is there.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2040000/Texas-bans-meals-death-row-Lawrence-Russell-Brewer-execution.html#ixzz1YsplzTiI

In a Christian Science Monitor story by staff writer Patrick Johnson on September 24 2011, the writer draws our attention to the Brewer execution and other death penalty news in the same week,

Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2011/0924/Troy-Davis-execution-protest-confronts-support-for-death-penalty

when he notes that the “ U.S. Supreme Court stayed the executions of two other Texas men in order to further review their innocence claims, while Alabama went forward with the 36th execution of the year in the U.S. on Thursday, leading to the death of Derrick Mason for a 1994 murder,”

An execution is final whatever new evidence or rehashing of the case may find the condemned man remains dead and only history is righted. Those who champion the cause of an end to the death penalty also have to face the fact that their efforts, if successful will benefit the innocent and the guilty.

Read more:    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Byrd,_Jr.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2040000/Texas-bans-meals-death-row-Lawrence-Russell-Brewer-execution.html#ixzz1YspErD4Z

Read more: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2011/0924/Troy-Davis-execution-protest-confronts-support-for-death-penalty

 

 

Please don’t let him be Jamaican!

passport

Please don’t let him be Jamaican!

Please don’t let him be Jamaican, please don’t let him be Jamaican, was what I was  thinking as  I read the  Daily Mail story sent to me by the Netateer, which began “ A judge cut the sentence of an illegal immigrant and drug dealer yesterday to help him escape deportation”. Jack Doyle and James Slack wrote the story for the U.K daily.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026222/UK-immigration-Drug-dealing-Vincent-Millers-sentence-cut-wont-kicked-out.html#ixzz1VC08Yf6J
However, he was Jamaican. Of course it shouldn’t matter, it’s just an example of someone doing something wrong, well someone doing a few things wrong and some of those things more than once.

According to the story, the Judge had decided to give a man guilty of dealing drugs an 11-month sentence for his crimes. Why, well if the sentence were more than 12 months the man would face deportation.

The question many are asking is why not deport him? When you hear the backstory as reported by Slack and Doyle, you will understand why. Here’s the very abridged version, a man we’ll call him Miller because that’s his name, overstayed when he first came to the U.K., was deported, came back and was deported again then came back with someone else’s identity and sent for his wife. Arrested for drug dealing he got his day in court. That brings us to that sentence and the explanation from the judge. According to the judge, sending him back to Jamaica would be “devastating”. Although given his record if deported he may not stay in Jamaica long enough to be devastated.

For those Jamaicans with no ambitions to engage in a criminal career on a visit to England this must all seem very wrong. These people may or may not get further than the High Commission and the prescreening process not even getting the chance to be deported once, let alone twice.

The fortunes of those who get deported back to Jamaica from countries such as the U.S. and the U.K. are mixed and deportation is not always about crime, some find it difficult to reconnect and get work others manage and there are a few who don’t stay deported long.

Over the years of living in Jamaica, I have heard of this happening, every so often, I would notice a new person in the district and be told they had been recently deported. After a while, when I noticed they were not around anymore I’d would ask what happened  and  hear  they’d gone back to “foreign”.

With the increasing use of high tech measures, such as fingerprint scanning and iris identification at immigration desks at airports, I sometimes wonder if we’re closer to a time when the legitimate visitor will find it easier to get into the U.S and Europe. It’s clear cases like Miller’s don’t help.

I’m also left wondering if the judge needed to be so concerned about the possibility of Miller being deported, after all  just because you get deported doesn’t mean you won’t be back.